Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell LT5 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell LT5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.5 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,100 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,265,306.1 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell LT5 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,124 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell LT5 Pro wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 79% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,265,306 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell LT5 Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell LT5 Pro 354% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell LT5 Pro 3% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,100 W)
- Goldshell LT5 Pro 79% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,265,306 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 3% more heat output (10,918 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 32% more home mining score (29.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell LT5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $800 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$7.44 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$3,516 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$6,231 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$8,947 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT5 Pro1,265,306.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell LT5 Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LT5 Pro is more profitable at $-7.44/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell LT5 Pro?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell LT5 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell LT5 Pro?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell LT5 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell LT5 Pro on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell LT5 Pro runs at 1,265,306.1 J/TH — a difference of 4,660,619.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,265,306 J/TH).