Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell CK Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell CK Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell CK Lite, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 114545355% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.3 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE Card isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell CK Lite actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK Lite 114545355% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 95% better power draw (65.0 vs 1,200.0 W)
- Goldshell CK Lite 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 100% better weight (0.3 vs 8,100.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK Lite 1746% more heat output (222 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 129% more home mining score (71.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $748 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$1,716 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$2,684 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$3,653 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Lite190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell CK Lite more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-2.65/day for the Goldshell CK Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell CK Lite?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK Lite at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell CK Lite?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell CK Lite?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,991.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 190 J/TH).