Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell CK Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK Lite comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 190 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK Lite sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK Lite 1749900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK Lite 64% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell CK Lite 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 8,100.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 175% more heat output (11,260 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 61% more home mining score (50.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $748 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$1,716 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$2,684 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$3,653 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Lite190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell CK Lite?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK Lite is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell CK Lite?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell CK Lite at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell CK Lite?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK Lite: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,476.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 190 J/TH).