Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell CK5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 2,400 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 200.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell CK5
Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell CK5 wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 218181718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell CK5's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE Card isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell CK5 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK5 218181718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 97% better power draw (65.0 vs 2,400.0 W)
- Goldshell CK5 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 200 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 100% better weight (0.3 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK5 3592% more heat output (222 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 173% more home mining score (71.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $998 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$2,943 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$4,887 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$6,832 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK5200.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell CK5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-5.33/day for the Goldshell CK5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell CK5 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell CK5?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell CK5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell CK5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,981.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 200 J/TH).