Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell CK5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 2,400 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 200.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell CK5
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK5 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 22222122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell CK5's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX II claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell CK5 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK5 22222122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 78% better power draw (530 vs 2,400 W)
- Goldshell CK5 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 200 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK5 353% more heat output (1,808 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 150% more home mining score (65.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $998 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$2,943 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$4,887 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$6,832 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK5200.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell CK5 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-5.33/day for the Goldshell CK5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell CK5 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell CK5?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell CK5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell CK5 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,614.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 200 J/TH).