Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell AE Card

Goldshell AE Card

Hashrate 5.5 MH/s Power 65 W Efficiency 11,818,181.8 J/TH
VS
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro

Goldshell KD-BOX Pro

Hashrate 2.6 TH/s Power 75 W Efficiency 28.9 J/TH

Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell AE Card Specification Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
5.5 MH/s Hashrate 2.6 TH/s
65 W Power Consumption 75 W
11,818,181.8 J/TH Efficiency 28.9 J/TH
35 dB Noise Level 35 dB
0.3 kg Weight 1.1 kg
222 BTU/hr BTU Output 256 BTU/hr
71/100 Home Mining Score 71/100
Release Year
Zksnark Algorithm KHeavyHash
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell AE Card

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.16
Daily Profit -$0.16
Monthly -$4.68
Yearly -$56.94

Goldshell KD-BOX Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000120 BTC $0.09
Daily Electricity -$0.18
Daily Profit -$0.09
Monthly -$2.59
Yearly -$31.57

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 47272627% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.6 TH/s) in the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro's favour. The Goldshell AE Card claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Goldshell KD-BOX Pro — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell KD-BOX Pro sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 47272627% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.6 TH/s)
  • Goldshell AE Card 13% better power draw (65.0 vs 75.0 W)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 100% better efficiency (11,818,181.8 vs 28.9 J/TH)
  • Goldshell AE Card 70% better weight (0.3 vs 1.1 kg)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 15% more heat output (222 vs 256 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell AE Card Metric Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP) $699
-$0.16 Daily net profit -$0.09
-$156 Net after 1 year -$731
-$213 Net after 2 years -$762
-$270 Net after 3 years -$794
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell KD-BOX Pro

28.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell KD-BOX Pro more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is more profitable at $-0.09/day compared to $-0.16/day for the Goldshell AE Card. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell KD-BOX Pro?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell KD-BOX Pro?

The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro runs at 28.9 J/TH — a difference of 11,818,153.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,181.8 vs 28.9 J/TH).