Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.6 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 28.9 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 1.1 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 256 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (5,925,925.9 vs 28.9 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD-BOX Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 481381% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 98% better power draw (3,200.0 vs 75.0 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 100% better efficiency (5,925,925.9 vs 28.9 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 59% better noise (85.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 91% better weight (12.5 vs 1.1 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 4167% more heat output (10,918 vs 256 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 145% more home mining score (29.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.09 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$731 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$762 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$794 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD-BOX ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro28.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KD-BOX Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is more profitable at $-0.09/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KD-BOX Pro?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro runs at 28.9 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,897.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,925.9 vs 28.9 J/TH).