Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell LB1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell LB1 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 87.0 GH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 919.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 1,100.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 273 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | LBRY |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell LB1
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell LB1 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 1581718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the Goldshell LB1's favour. The Goldshell AE Card claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell LB1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell LB1 1581718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 19% better power draw (65.0 vs 80.0 W)
- Goldshell LB1 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 920 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 100% better weight (0.3 vs 1,100.0 kg)
- Goldshell LB1 23% more heat output (222 vs 273 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 97% more home mining score (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell LB1 |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $700 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$0.19 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$769 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$838 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$907 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LB1919.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell LB1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-0.19/day for the Goldshell LB1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell LB1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell LB1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell LB1: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Goldshell LB1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell LB1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell LB1 runs at 919.5 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,262.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 920 J/TH).