Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell LB1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell LB1 |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 87.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 919.5 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 1,100.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 273 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | LBRY |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell LB1
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell LB1 comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 920 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell LB1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell LB1 16011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell LB1 98% better power draw (3,200.0 vs 80.0 W)
- Goldshell LB1 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 920 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 99% better weight (12.5 vs 1,100.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 3899% more heat output (10,918 vs 273 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell LB1 24% more home mining score (29.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell LB1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $700 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.19 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$769 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$838 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$907 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell LB1Score: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LB1919.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell LB1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LB1 is more profitable at $-0.19/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell LB1?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell LB1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell LB1?
The Goldshell LB1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell LB1?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell LB1 runs at 919.5 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,006.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 920 J/TH).