Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 11.0 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 2,820 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 256.4 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,622 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 199999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 11.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)'s favour. That said, the Goldshell AE Card isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 199999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 98% better power draw (65.0 vs 2,820.0 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 256 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 98% better weight (0.3 vs 13.1 kg)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 4238% more heat output (222 vs 9,622 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 223% more home mining score (71.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$6.37 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$2,756 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$5,081 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$7,407 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)256.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-6.37/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) runs at 256.4 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,925.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 256 J/TH).