Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 11.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 2,820 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 256.4 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,622 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 256 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max II claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 2036937% more hashrate (0.0 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 12% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,820 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 256 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 5% better weight (12.5 vs 13.1 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 13% more heat output (10,918 vs 9,622 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 32% more home mining score (29.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$6.37 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$2,756 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$5,081 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$7,407 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)256.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) is more profitable at $-6.37/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) runs at 256.4 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,669.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 256 J/TH).