Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell AE Card

Goldshell AE Card

Hashrate 5.5 MH/s Power 65 W Efficiency 11,818,181.8 J/TH
VS
Goldshell X5

Goldshell X5

Hashrate 850.0 MH/s Power 1,450 W Efficiency 1,705,882.4 J/TH

Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell X5

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell AE Card Specification Goldshell X5
5.5 MH/s Hashrate 850.0 MH/s
65 W Power Consumption 1,450 W
11,818,181.8 J/TH Efficiency 1,705,882.4 J/TH
35 dB Noise Level
0.3 kg Weight 4,600.0 kg
222 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,947 BTU/hr
71/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Zksnark Algorithm Scrypt
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell AE Card

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.16
Daily Profit -$0.16
Monthly -$4.68
Yearly -$56.94

Goldshell X5

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.48
Daily Profit -$3.48
Monthly -$104.40
Yearly -$1,270.19

Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

The Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell X5 finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell X5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Goldshell X5 15355% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell AE Card 96% better power draw (65.0 vs 1,450.0 W)
  • Goldshell X5 86% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 1,705,882 J/TH)
  • Goldshell AE Card 100% better weight (0.3 vs 4,600.0 kg)
  • Goldshell X5 2131% more heat output (222 vs 4,947 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell AE Card 129% more home mining score (71.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell AE Card Metric Goldshell X5
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,200
-$0.16 Daily net profit -$3.48
-$156 Net after 1 year -$2,470
-$213 Net after 2 years -$3,740
-$270 Net after 3 years -$5,011
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell AE Card

Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell X5

1,705,882.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell X5?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-3.48/day for the Goldshell X5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell X5 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell X5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell X5?

The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell X5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell X5?

The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell X5 runs at 1,705,882.4 J/TH — a difference of 10,112,299.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 1,705,882 J/TH).