Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell CK-LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell CK-LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK-LITE edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 190 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell CK-LITE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK-LITE 1166567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 63% better power draw (3,200 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 24% better noise (85.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 40% better weight (12.5 vs 7.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 167% more heat output (10,918 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 79% more home mining score (29.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$1,567 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$2,536 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$3,504 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-LITEScore: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-LITE190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell CK-LITE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-LITE is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell CK-LITE?
The Goldshell CK-LITE is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell CK-LITE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK-LITE scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell CK-LITE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-LITE runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,735.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 190 J/TH).