Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell KD Max |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 40.2 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,350 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 83.3 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,430 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell KD Max
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD Max comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 7444344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 40.2 TH/s) in the Goldshell KD Max's favour. The Goldshell AE Max II claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD Max diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell KD Max 7444344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 40.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max II 4% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,350 W)
- Goldshell KD Max 100% better efficiency (5,925,925.9 vs 83.3 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell KD Max 5% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,430 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 32% more home mining score (29.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell KD Max |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,320 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$6.59 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$3,726 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$6,133 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$8,539 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD Max83.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KD Max more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD Max is more profitable at $-6.59/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KD Max?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell KD Max at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KD Max?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell KD Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD Max on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell KD Max runs at 83.3 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,842.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,925.9 vs 83.3 J/TH).