Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell LT5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.1 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 2,080 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,014,634.2 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,097 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell LT5
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell LT5 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 83% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,014,634 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in home mining score and noise level and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell LT5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell LT5 280% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell LT5 35% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,080 W)
- Goldshell LT5 83% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,014,634 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 54% more heat output (10,918 vs 7,097 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 12% more home mining score (29.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,364 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$4.99 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$10,186 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$12,008 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$13,830 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT51,014,634.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell LT5?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LT5 is more profitable at $-4.99/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell LT5 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell LT5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell LT5?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell LT5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell LT5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell LT5 runs at 1,014,634.2 J/TH — a difference of 4,911,291.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,014,634 J/TH).