Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell LT5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.1 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 2,080 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,014,634.2 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,097 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell LT5
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell LT5, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Its biggest concrete edge: 89% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,014,634 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max holds the edge in home mining score and noise level and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell LT5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell LT5 469% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell LT5 37% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,080 W)
- Goldshell LT5 89% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,014,634 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 59% more heat output (11,260 vs 7,097 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 92% more home mining score (50.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,364 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$4.99 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$10,186 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$12,008 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$13,830 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT51,014,634.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell LT5?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LT5 is more profitable at $-4.99/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell LT5: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell LT5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell LT5: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell LT5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell LT5 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell LT5 runs at 1,014,634.2 J/TH — a difference of 8,152,032.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 89% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,014,634 J/TH).