Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 810.0 MH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 617,284.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 3.7 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS wins on 5 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 90% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 617,284 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS 50% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS 84% better power draw (3,200 vs 500 W)
- Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS 90% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 617,284 J/TH)
- Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS 59% better noise (85.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS 70% better weight (12.5 vs 3.7 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 540% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS 138% more home mining score (29.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $420 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$1.20 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$858 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$1,296 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,734 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUSScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS617,284.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell MINI DOGE III PLUS runs at 617,284.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,308,642.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 90% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 617,284 J/TH).