Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Antminer AL1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Specification | Antminer AL1 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 16.0 TH/s |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 3,360 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 210.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 614 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,464 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Antminer AL1
Based on BTC price of $79,091 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer AL1 comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 4344% more hashrate (0.4 vs 16.0 TH/s) in the Antminer AL1's favour. The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Antminer AL1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer AL1 4344% more hashrate (0.4 vs 16.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 95% better power draw (180 vs 3,360 W)
- Antminer AL1 58% better efficiency (500 vs 210 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 85% better weight (2.2 vs 14.5 kg)
- Antminer AL1 1767% more heat output (614 vs 11,464 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 9% more home mining score (33.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Metric | Antminer AL1 |
|---|---|---|
| $340 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $10,000 |
| -$0.42 | Daily net profit | -$7.48 |
| -$493 | Net after 1 year | -$12,731 |
| -$646 | Net after 2 years | -$15,462 |
| -$799 | Net after 3 years | -$18,192 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer AL1210.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or Antminer AL1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-7.48/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or Antminer AL1?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or Antminer AL1?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Antminer AL1?
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH — a difference of 290.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficiency (500 vs 210 J/TH).