Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Iceriver ALPH AL0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) | Specification | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 GH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)
Iceriver ALPH AL0
Based on BTC price of $78,221 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 72% better power draw (360 vs 100 W). The Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) and Iceriver ALPH AL0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 80% more hashrate (0.7 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 72% better power draw (360 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 50% better efficiency (500 vs 250 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 12% better weight (2.2 vs 2.5 kg)
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 260% more heat output (1,228 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 88% more home mining score (34.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) | Metric | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $178 |
| -$0.84 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$505 | Net after 1 year | -$260 |
| -$811 | Net after 2 years | -$343 |
| -$1,117 | Net after 3 years | -$425 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALPH AL0Score: 64/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALPH AL0250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) or Iceriver ALPH AL0 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-0.84/day for the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Iceriver ALPH AL0: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) or the Iceriver ALPH AL0?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) and Iceriver ALPH AL0 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Iceriver ALPH AL0 runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 250.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficiency (500 vs 250 J/TH).
Compare Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) with...
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE Card
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE Max
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE Max II
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX II
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh