Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs IceRiver AL0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) | Specification | IceRiver AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 MH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 10 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)
IceRiver AL0
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 179900% more hashrate (0.7 vs 0.0 TH/s). The IceRiver AL0 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) and IceRiver AL0 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 179900% more hashrate (0.7 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 72% better power draw (360 vs 100 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 100% better efficiency (500 vs 250,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 12% better weight (2.2 vs 2.5 kg)
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) 260% more heat output (1,228 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 109% more home mining score (34.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) | Metric | IceRiver AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$0.84 | Daily net profit | -$0.24 |
| -$505 | Net after 1 year | -$287 |
| -$811 | Net after 2 years | -$374 |
| -$1,117 | Net after 3 years | -$462 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs IceRiver AL0: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-0.84/day for the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) or the IceRiver AL0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) or the IceRiver AL0?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) and IceRiver AL0 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) runs at 500.0 J/TH while the IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 249,500.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (500 vs 250,000 J/TH).
Compare Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) with...
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE Card
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE Max
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE Max II
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX II
- Goldshell AL BOX II (ALPH 720GH 360W) vs Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh