Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $74,273 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the Iceriver AL3 offers 61% better efficiency at 233.3 J/TH compared to the Iceriver KS2 at 600.0 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS2Score: 45/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AL3 or Iceriver KS2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.82/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AL3 or Iceriver KS2?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AL3 or Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver KS2 scores 45/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 366.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.