Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
IceRiver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the IceRiver KS3M comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and IceRiver KS3M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS3M 1999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 85% better power draw (500 vs 3,400 W)
- IceRiver KS3M 100% better efficiency (1,666,667 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 40% better noise (45.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 72% better weight (4.0 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 580% more heat output (1,706 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 72% more home mining score (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,500 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$11,400 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$14,299 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$17,199 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE1 LiteScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the IceRiver KS3M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS3M: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is quieter at 45 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or IceRiver KS3M?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and IceRiver KS3M on J/TH?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,100.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,666,667 vs 567 J/TH).