Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
IceRiver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the IceRiver KS3M comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 833233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). The Iceriver AE2 720Mh claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh and IceRiver KS3M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS3M 833233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 62% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,400 W)
- IceRiver KS3M 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 20% better noise (60.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS3M 7% better weight (15.5 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 162% more heat output (4,436 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 44% more home mining score (52.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,500 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$11,400 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$14,299 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$17,199 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or IceRiver KS3M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the IceRiver KS3M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh is quieter at 60 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the IceRiver KS3M?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AE2 720Mh and IceRiver KS3M?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,804,988.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 567 J/TH).