Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 4.2 TH/s |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 119.1 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,124 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1399900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.2 TH/s). The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite claws back ground on noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 1399900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 100% better efficiency (1,666,667 vs 119 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 10% better noise (45.0 vs 50.0 dB)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$1.05 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$1,082 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$1,465 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$1,848 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-1.20/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite on J/TH?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,547.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,666,667 vs 119 J/TH).