IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver AL0 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 4.2 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 119.1 J/TH |
| 10 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver AL0
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1049900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.2 TH/s). The IceRiver AL0 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver AL0 and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 1049900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.2 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 80% better power draw (100 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 100% better efficiency (250,000 vs 119 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 80% better noise (10.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- IceRiver AL0 38% better weight (2.5 vs 4.0 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 400% more heat output (341 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 15% more home mining score (71.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver AL0 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$1.05 |
| -$287 | Net after 1 year | -$1,082 |
| -$374 | Net after 2 years | -$1,465 |
| -$462 | Net after 3 years | -$1,848 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver AL0 or the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-1.05/day for the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver AL0 or the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver AL0 or the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 62/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver AL0 and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite on J/TH?
The IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH — a difference of 249,881.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (250,000 vs 119 J/TH).