Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 2,950 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 14.6 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,065 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s)
Based on BTC price of $79,091 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s) wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 86% better efficiency (210.0 vs 29.5 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s)'s favour. That said, the Antminer AL1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s) 525% more hashrate (16.0 vs 100.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s) 12% better power draw (3,360 vs 2,950 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s) 86% better efficiency (210.0 vs 29.5 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 1% better weight (14.5 vs 14.6 kg)
- Antminer AL1 14% more heat output (11,464 vs 10,065 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 64% more home mining score (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $525 |
| -$7.48 | Daily net profit | -$3.44 |
| -$12,731 | Net after 1 year | -$1,781 |
| -$15,462 | Net after 2 years | -$3,036 |
| -$18,192 | Net after 3 years | -$4,292 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s)29.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s) is more profitable at $-3.44/day compared to $-7.48/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s)?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s) on J/TH?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (100Th/s) runs at 29.5 J/TH — a difference of 180.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (210.0 vs 29.5 J/TH).