Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 GH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 MH/s |
| 2,556 W | Power Consumption | 232 W |
| 1,065,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 580,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 2.4 kg |
| 8,721 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 792 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 91% better power draw (2,556 vs 232 W). The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 500% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 91% better power draw (2,556 vs 232 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 46% better efficiency (1,065,000 vs 580,000 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 2.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 1002% more heat output (8,721 vs 792 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 41% more home mining score (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$6.13 | Daily net profit | -$0.56 |
| -$3,239 | Net after 1 year | -$602 |
| -$5,478 | Net after 2 years | -$805 |
| -$7,717 | Net after 3 years | -$1,009 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini SE PlusScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus580,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) or the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-6.13/day for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) or the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus?
The iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) runs at 1,065,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus runs at 580,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 485,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 46% better efficiency (1,065,000 vs 580,000 J/TH).