Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.4 GH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 2,556 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,065,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,721 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer AL1 wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 666567% more hashrate (16.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer AL1 666567% more hashrate (16.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 24% better power draw (3,360 vs 2,556 W)
- Antminer AL1 100% better efficiency (210 vs 1,065,000 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 14,200.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 31% more heat output (11,464 vs 8,721 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 64% more home mining score (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$6.13 |
| -$12,733 | Net after 1 year | -$3,239 |
| -$15,466 | Net after 2 years | -$5,478 |
| -$18,199 | Net after 3 years | -$7,717 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer AL1210.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) is more profitable at $-6.13/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) runs at 1,065,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,064,790.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (210 vs 1,065,000 J/TH).