Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo V1 Classic

iPollo V1 Classic

Hashrate 1.6 GH/s Power 1,240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus

iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus

Hashrate 400.0 MH/s Power 232 W Efficiency 580,000.0 J/TH

iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V1 Classic Specification iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
1.6 GH/s Hashrate 400.0 MH/s
1,240 W Power Consumption 232 W
800,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 580,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
13,000.0 kg Weight 2.4 kg
4,231 BTU/hr BTU Output 792 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Etchash Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V1 Classic

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.98
Daily Profit -$2.98
Monthly -$89.28
Yearly -$1,086.22

iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.56
Daily Profit -$0.56
Monthly -$16.70
Yearly -$203.23

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption). Its biggest concrete edge: 81% better power draw (1,240 vs 232 W). The iPollo V1 Classic claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the iPollo V1 Classic and iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iPollo V1 Classic 288% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 81% better power draw (1,240 vs 232 W)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 28% better efficiency (800,000 vs 580,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 100% better weight (13,000.0 vs 2.4 kg)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 434% more heat output (4,231 vs 792 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iPollo V1 Classic Metric iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
$369 Upfront cost (MSRP) $399
-$2.98 Daily net profit -$0.56
-$1,455 Net after 1 year -$602
-$2,541 Net after 2 years -$805
-$3,628 Net after 3 years -$1,009
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus

580,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iPollo V1 Classic or the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus runs at 580,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 220,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 28% better efficiency (800,000 vs 580,000 J/TH).