Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo B1L

iPollo B1L

Hashrate 58.0 TH/s Power 3,000 W Efficiency 51.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Classic

iPollo V1 Classic

Hashrate 1.6 GH/s Power 1,240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

iPollo B1L vs iPollo V1 Classic

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo B1L Specification iPollo V1 Classic
58.0 TH/s Hashrate 1.6 GH/s
3,000 W Power Consumption 1,240 W
51.7 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
12,700.0 kg Weight 13,000.0 kg
10,236 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,231 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm Etchash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo B1L

Daily Revenue 0.00002669 BTC $2.09
Daily Electricity -$7.20
Daily Profit -$5.11
Monthly -$153.41
Yearly -$1,866.51

iPollo V1 Classic

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.98
Daily Profit -$2.98
Monthly -$89.28
Yearly -$1,086.22

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo B1L comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 3741835% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Classic holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: iPollo B1L — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo B1L and iPollo V1 Classic sit on each measurable spec:

  • iPollo B1L 3741835% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 59% better power draw (3,000 vs 1,240 W)
  • iPollo B1L 100% better efficiency (51.7 vs 800,000.0 J/TH)
  • iPollo B1L 2% better weight (12,700 vs 13,000 kg)
  • iPollo B1L 142% more heat output (10,236 vs 4,231 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 41% more home mining score (22.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iPollo B1L Metric iPollo V1 Classic
$430 Upfront cost (MSRP) $369
-$5.11 Daily net profit -$2.98
-$2,297 Net after 1 year -$1,455
-$4,163 Net after 2 years -$2,541
-$6,030 Net after 3 years -$3,628
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V1 Classic

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo B1L

51.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo B1L or the iPollo V1 Classic?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Classic is more profitable at $-2.98/day compared to $-5.11/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iPollo B1L or the iPollo V1 Classic better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

iPollo B1L vs iPollo V1 Classic: which fits a residential setup better?

The iPollo V1 Classic scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo B1L and iPollo V1 Classic?

The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 799,948.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (51.7 vs 800,000.0 J/TH).