Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo G1 Mini

iPollo G1 Mini

Hashrate 1.2 GH/s Power 120 W Efficiency 100,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Classic

iPollo V1 Classic

Hashrate 1.6 GH/s Power 1,240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

iPollo G1 Mini vs iPollo V1 Classic

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo G1 Mini Specification iPollo V1 Classic
1.2 GH/s Hashrate 1.6 GH/s
120 W Power Consumption 1,240 W
100,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
2.9 kg Weight 13,000.0 kg
409 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,231 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Cuckatoo32 Algorithm Etchash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo G1 Mini

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.29
Daily Profit -$0.29
Monthly -$8.64
Yearly -$105.10

iPollo V1 Classic

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.98
Daily Profit -$2.98
Monthly -$89.28
Yearly -$1,086.22

Based on BTC price of $78,293 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo G1 Mini comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 90% better power draw (120 vs 1,240 W). The iPollo V1 Classic claws back ground on home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo G1 Mini — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The iPollo G1 Mini and iPollo V1 Classic diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iPollo V1 Classic 29% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 90% better power draw (120 vs 1,240 W)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 88% better efficiency (100,000 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 100% better weight (2.9 vs 13,000.0 kg)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 933% more heat output (409 vs 4,231 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 3% more home mining score (30.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

iPollo G1 Mini Metric iPollo V1 Classic
$277 Upfront cost (MSRP) $369
-$0.29 Daily net profit -$2.98
-$382 Net after 1 year -$1,455
-$487 Net after 2 years -$2,541
-$592 Net after 3 years -$3,628
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V1 Classic

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo G1 Mini

100,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iPollo G1 Mini or iPollo V1 Classic more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo G1 Mini is more profitable at $-0.29/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iPollo G1 Mini or iPollo V1 Classic?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo G1 Mini or the iPollo V1 Classic?

The iPollo V1 Classic scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo G1 Mini). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

iPollo G1 Mini vs iPollo V1 Classic: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iPollo G1 Mini runs at 100,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 700,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficiency (100,000 vs 800,000 J/TH).