Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo B1L

iPollo B1L

Hashrate 58.0 TH/s Power 3,000 W Efficiency 51.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo G1 Mini

iPollo G1 Mini

Hashrate 1.2 GH/s Power 120 W Efficiency 100,000.0 J/TH

iPollo B1L vs iPollo G1 Mini

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo B1L Specification iPollo G1 Mini
58.0 TH/s Hashrate 1.2 GH/s
3,000 W Power Consumption 120 W
51.7 J/TH Efficiency 100,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
12,700.0 kg Weight 2.9 kg
10,236 BTU/hr BTU Output 409 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm Cuckatoo32
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo B1L

Daily Revenue 0.00002669 BTC $2.09
Daily Electricity -$7.20
Daily Profit -$5.11
Monthly -$153.41
Yearly -$1,866.51

iPollo G1 Mini

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.29
Daily Profit -$0.29
Monthly -$8.64
Yearly -$105.10

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo B1L, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 4833233% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo G1 Mini holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo B1L — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the iPollo B1L and iPollo G1 Mini actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iPollo B1L 4833233% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 96% better power draw (3,000 vs 120 W)
  • iPollo B1L 100% better efficiency (51.7 vs 100,000.0 J/TH)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 100% better weight (12,700.0 vs 2.9 kg)
  • iPollo B1L 2400% more heat output (10,236 vs 409 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 36% more home mining score (22.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iPollo B1L Metric iPollo G1 Mini
$430 Upfront cost (MSRP) $277
-$5.11 Daily net profit -$0.29
-$2,297 Net after 1 year -$382
-$4,163 Net after 2 years -$487
-$6,030 Net after 3 years -$592
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo G1 Mini

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo B1L

51.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo B1L or the iPollo G1 Mini?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo G1 Mini is more profitable at $-0.29/day compared to $-5.11/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iPollo B1L or the iPollo G1 Mini better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo B1L or iPollo G1 Mini?

The iPollo G1 Mini scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the iPollo B1L and iPollo G1 Mini on J/TH?

The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the iPollo G1 Mini runs at 100,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 99,948.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (51.7 vs 100,000.0 J/TH).