Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo B1L

iPollo B1L

Hashrate 58.0 TH/s Power 3,000 W Efficiency 51.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Hyd

iPollo V1 Hyd

Hashrate 900.0 MH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 888,888.9 J/TH

iPollo B1L vs iPollo V1 Hyd

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo B1L Specification iPollo V1 Hyd
58.0 TH/s Hashrate 900.0 MH/s
3,000 W Power Consumption 800 W
51.7 J/TH Efficiency 888,888.9 J/TH
Noise Level
12,700.0 kg Weight 8.0 kg
10,236 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,730 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo B1L

Daily Revenue 0.00002669 BTC $2.09
Daily Electricity -$7.20
Daily Profit -$5.11
Monthly -$153.37
Yearly -$1,866.00

iPollo V1 Hyd

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$1.92
Monthly -$57.60
Yearly -$700.79

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo B1L wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 6444344% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Hyd holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo B1L — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo B1L and iPollo V1 Hyd sit on each measurable spec:

  • iPollo B1L 6444344% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 73% better power draw (3,000 vs 800 W)
  • iPollo B1L 100% better efficiency (51.7 vs 888,888.9 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 100% better weight (12,700.0 vs 8.0 kg)
  • iPollo B1L 275% more heat output (10,236 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 36% more home mining score (22.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

iPollo B1L Metric iPollo V1 Hyd
$430 Upfront cost (MSRP) $489
-$5.11 Daily net profit -$1.92
-$2,296 Net after 1 year -$1,190
-$4,162 Net after 2 years -$1,891
-$6,028 Net after 3 years -$2,591
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V1 Hyd

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo B1L

51.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

iPollo B1L vs iPollo V1 Hyd: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Hyd is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-5.11/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iPollo B1L or the iPollo V1 Hyd better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo B1L or iPollo V1 Hyd?

The iPollo V1 Hyd scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the iPollo B1L and iPollo V1 Hyd on J/TH?

The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH — a difference of 888,837.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (51.7 vs 888,888.9 J/TH).