Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo G1

iPollo G1

Hashrate 36.0 GH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 77,777.8 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Hyd

iPollo V1 Hyd

Hashrate 900.0 MH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 888,888.9 J/TH

iPollo G1 vs iPollo V1 Hyd

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo G1 Specification iPollo V1 Hyd
36.0 GH/s Hashrate 900.0 MH/s
2,800 W Power Consumption 800 W
77,777.8 J/TH Efficiency 888,888.9 J/TH
Noise Level
19,000.0 kg Weight 8.0 kg
9,554 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,730 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Cuckatoo32 Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo G1

Daily Revenue 0.00000002 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$6.72
Monthly -$201.56
Yearly -$2,452.33

iPollo V1 Hyd

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$1.92
Monthly -$57.60
Yearly -$700.79

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo G1 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 3900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Hyd holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iPollo G1 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the iPollo G1 and iPollo V1 Hyd actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iPollo G1 3900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 71% better power draw (2,800 vs 800 W)
  • iPollo G1 91% better efficiency (77,778 vs 888,889 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 100% better weight (19,000.0 vs 8.0 kg)
  • iPollo G1 250% more heat output (9,554 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 36% more home mining score (22.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iPollo G1 Metric iPollo V1 Hyd
$1,599 Upfront cost (MSRP) $489
-$6.72 Daily net profit -$1.92
-$4,051 Net after 1 year -$1,190
-$6,504 Net after 2 years -$1,891
-$8,956 Net after 3 years -$2,591
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V1 Hyd

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo G1

77,777.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo G1 or the iPollo V1 Hyd?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Hyd is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-6.72/day for the iPollo G1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iPollo G1 or iPollo V1 Hyd?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo G1 or iPollo V1 Hyd?

The iPollo V1 Hyd scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo G1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo G1 and iPollo V1 Hyd?

The iPollo G1 runs at 77,777.8 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH — a difference of 811,111.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficiency (77,778 vs 888,889 J/TH).