Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo V1

iPollo V1

Hashrate 3.6 GH/s Power 3,100 W Efficiency 861,111.1 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Hyd

iPollo V1 Hyd

Hashrate 900.0 MH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 888,888.9 J/TH

iPollo V1 vs iPollo V1 Hyd

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V1 Specification iPollo V1 Hyd
3.6 GH/s Hashrate 900.0 MH/s
3,100 W Power Consumption 800 W
861,111.1 J/TH Efficiency 888,888.9 J/TH
Noise Level
13,000.0 kg Weight 8.0 kg
10,577 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,730 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$7.44
Monthly -$223.20
Yearly -$2,715.55

iPollo V1 Hyd

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$1.92
Monthly -$57.60
Yearly -$700.79

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V1 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 300% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Hyd claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iPollo V1 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The iPollo V1 and iPollo V1 Hyd diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iPollo V1 300% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 74% better power draw (3,100 vs 800 W)
  • iPollo V1 3% better efficiency (861,111 vs 888,889 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 100% better weight (13,000.0 vs 8.0 kg)
  • iPollo V1 288% more heat output (10,577 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 36% more home mining score (22.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iPollo V1 Metric iPollo V1 Hyd
$1,699 Upfront cost (MSRP) $489
-$7.44 Daily net profit -$1.92
-$4,415 Net after 1 year -$1,190
-$7,130 Net after 2 years -$1,891
-$9,846 Net after 3 years -$2,591
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V1 Hyd

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V1

861,111.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

iPollo V1 vs iPollo V1 Hyd: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Hyd is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iPollo V1 or the iPollo V1 Hyd better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 or the iPollo V1 Hyd?

The iPollo V1 Hyd scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo V1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 and iPollo V1 Hyd?

The iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH — a difference of 27,777.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficiency (861,111 vs 888,889 J/TH).