Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 MH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 232 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 580,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 2.4 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 792 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer E9 Pro wins on 4 of 6 factors (hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 820% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Antminer E9 Pro's favour. The iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus holds the edge in efficiency and power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer E9 Pro 820% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 89% better power draw (2,200 vs 232 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 3% better efficiency (597,826 vs 580,000 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 83% better weight (14.2 vs 2.4 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 848% more heat output (7,506 vs 792 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 29% more home mining score (40.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$0.56 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$602 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$805 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$1,009 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus580,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus on J/TH?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus runs at 580,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 17,826.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficiency (597,826 vs 580,000 J/TH).