Bitmain Antminer G2 vs iPollo V1 Mini Classic
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer G2 | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Classic |
|---|---|---|
| 220.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 130.0 MH/s |
| 1,200 W | Power Consumption | 104 W |
| 5,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 800,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 15,000.0 kg | Weight | 1,000.0 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 355 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | Etchash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer G2
iPollo V1 Mini Classic
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic wins on 2 of 3 factors (efficiency, power consumption). The standout gap is 91% better power draw (1,200 vs 104 W) in the iPollo V1 Mini Classic's favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer G2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer G2 and iPollo V1 Mini Classic actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer G2 69% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 91% better power draw (1,200 vs 104 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 85% better efficiency (5,454,545 vs 800,000 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 93% better weight (15,000 vs 1,000 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer G2 1054% more heat output (4,094 vs 355 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer G2 3% more home mining score (31.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer G2 | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Classic |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $285 |
| -$2.88 | Daily net profit | -$0.25 |
| -$1,051 | Net after 1 year | -$376 |
| -$2,102 | Net after 2 years | -$467 |
| -$3,154 | Net after 3 years | -$558 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer G2Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini Classic800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer G2 or iPollo V1 Mini Classic more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic is more profitable at $-0.25/day compared to $-2.88/day for the Bitmain Antminer G2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer G2 vs iPollo V1 Mini Classic: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer G2 or iPollo V1 Mini Classic?
The Bitmain Antminer G2 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer G2 vs iPollo V1 Mini Classic: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer G2 runs at 5,454,545.5 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 4,654,545.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (5,454,545 vs 800,000 J/TH).