Antminer K7 vs Goldshell CK Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer K7 | Specification | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 63.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 3,080 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 10,509 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer K7
Goldshell CK Lite
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer K7, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 908% more hashrate (63.5 vs 6.3 TH/s) in the Antminer K7's favour. That said, the Goldshell CK Lite isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer K7 and Goldshell CK Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer K7 908% more hashrate (63.5 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK Lite 61% better power draw (3,080 vs 1,200 W)
- Antminer K7 75% better efficiency (48.5 vs 190.5 J/TH)
- Antminer K7 100% better weight (14.0 vs 8,100.0 kg)
- Antminer K7 157% more heat output (10,509 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Antminer K7 16% more home mining score (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer K7 | Metric | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $748 |
| -$5.08 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$5,355 | Net after 1 year | -$1,715 |
| -$7,210 | Net after 2 years | -$2,683 |
| -$9,065 | Net after 3 years | -$3,650 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer K7Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer K748.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer K7 vs Goldshell CK Lite: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK Lite is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-5.08/day for the Antminer K7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer K7 or the Goldshell CK Lite better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer K7 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell CK Lite at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer K7 or the Goldshell CK Lite?
The Antminer K7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer K7 and Goldshell CK Lite on J/TH?
The Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 142.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficiency (48.5 vs 190.5 J/TH).