Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 11.0 TH/s |
| 3,188 W | Power Consumption | 3,600 W |
| 384.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 327.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 10,878 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)
Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 33% more hashrate (8.3 vs 11.0 TH/s) in the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus's favour. The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 33% more hashrate (8.3 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 11% better power draw (3,188 vs 3,600 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 15% better efficiency (384 vs 327 J/TH)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 13% more heat output (10,878 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus 36% more home mining score (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| $3,850 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,294 |
| -$7.35 | Daily net profit | -$8.24 |
| -$6,534 | Net after 1 year | -$10,303 |
| -$9,218 | Net after 2 years | -$13,312 |
| -$11,901 | Net after 3 years | -$16,322 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Dragonball KS6 Pro PlusScore: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) is more profitable at $-7.35/day compared to $-8.24/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus?
The Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus?
The Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) runs at 384.1 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro Plus runs at 327.3 J/TH — a difference of 56.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficiency (384 vs 327 J/TH).