Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs IceRiver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) | Specification | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)
IceRiver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 900% more hashrate (20.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS2 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) and IceRiver KS2 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 900% more hashrate (20.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS2 60% better power draw (3,000 vs 1,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 75% better efficiency (150 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS2 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS2 5% better weight (15.8 vs 15.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 150% more heat output (10,236 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS2 44% more home mining score (36.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) | Metric | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,000 |
| -$6.48 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$3,164 | Net after 1 year | -$6,025 |
| -$5,529 | Net after 2 years | -$7,050 |
| -$7,895 | Net after 3 years | -$8,075 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS2Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs IceRiver KS2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-6.48/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs IceRiver KS2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS2 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) or the IceRiver KS2?
The IceRiver KS2 scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) and IceRiver KS2?
The Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) runs at 150.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 450.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficiency (150 vs 600 J/TH).