Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer AL1

Antminer AL1

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 210.0 J/TH
VS
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)

Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)

Hashrate 20.0 TH/s Power 3,000 W Efficiency 150.0 J/TH

Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer AL1 Specification Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)
16.0 TH/s Hashrate 20.0 TH/s
3,360 W Power Consumption 3,000 W
210.0 J/TH Efficiency 150.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.5 kg Weight 15.8 kg
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,236 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
Blake3 Algorithm KHeavyHash
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer AL1

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$7.49
Monthly -$224.66
Yearly -$2,733.36

Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00000920 BTC $0.72
Daily Electricity -$7.20
Daily Profit -$6.48
Monthly -$194.43
Yearly -$2,365.50

Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) edges it: 4 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 29% better efficiency (210 vs 150 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 25% more hashrate (16.0 vs 20.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 11% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,000 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 29% better efficiency (210 vs 150 J/TH)
  • Antminer AL1 8% better weight (14.5 vs 15.8 kg)
  • Antminer AL1 12% more heat output (11,464 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer AL1 Metric Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)
$10,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $799
-$7.49 Daily net profit -$6.48
-$12,733 Net after 1 year -$3,165
-$15,467 Net after 2 years -$5,530
-$18,200 Net after 3 years -$7,896
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)

150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) is more profitable at $-6.48/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)?

The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) runs at 150.0 J/TH — a difference of 60.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 29% better efficiency (210 vs 150 J/TH).