Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th), which leads on 4 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 74% better efficiency (150 vs 567 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)'s favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) and Iceriver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 233% more hashrate (20.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 12% better power draw (3,000 vs 3,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 74% better efficiency (150 vs 567 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 8% better weight (15.8 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 13% more heat output (10,236 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$6.48 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$3,165 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$5,530 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$7,896 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) or the Iceriver KS3M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) is more profitable at $-6.48/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) or the Iceriver KS3M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) or Iceriver KS3M?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) and Iceriver KS3M on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) runs at 150.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 416.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficiency (150 vs 567 J/TH).