Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Goldshell DG Card
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Specification | Goldshell DG Card |
|---|---|---|
| 504.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 80.0 MH/s |
| 800 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 1,587,301.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 812,500.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)
Goldshell DG Card
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell DG Card edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 92% better power draw (800.0 vs 65.0 W). The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) claws back ground on price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and Goldshell DG Card sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 530% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell DG Card 92% better power draw (800.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Goldshell DG Card 49% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 812,500 J/TH)
- Goldshell DG Card 100% better weight (4,400.0 vs 0.3 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 1131% more heat output (2,730 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell DG Card 137% more home mining score (30.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Metric | Goldshell DG Card |
|---|---|---|
| $165 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $113 |
| -$1.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.16 |
| -$866 | Net after 1 year | -$170 |
| -$1,567 | Net after 2 years | -$227 |
| -$2,267 | Net after 3 years | -$284 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell DG CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell DG Card812,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Goldshell DG Card: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell DG Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-1.92/day for the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) or the Goldshell DG Card better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell DG Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Goldshell DG Card: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell DG Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and Goldshell DG Card on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH while the Goldshell DG Card runs at 812,500.0 J/TH — a difference of 774,801.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 49% better efficiency (1,587,302 vs 812,500 J/TH).