Antminer L7 vs Goldshell Mini Doge II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer L7 | Specification | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| 9,050.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 420.0 MH/s |
| 3,425 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 378,453.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 952,381.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 11,686 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer L7
Goldshell Mini Doge II
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer L7 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 2055% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell Mini Doge II claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer L7 and Goldshell Mini Doge II sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer L7 2055% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 88% better power draw (3,425 vs 400 W)
- Antminer L7 60% better efficiency (378,453 vs 952,381 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 84% better weight (14.4 vs 2.3 kg)
- Antminer L7 756% more heat output (11,686 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 92% more home mining score (36.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer L7 | Metric | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| $4,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $258 |
| -$8.22 | Daily net profit | -$0.96 |
| -$7,500 | Net after 1 year | -$608 |
| -$10,500 | Net after 2 years | -$959 |
| -$13,501 | Net after 3 years | -$1,309 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini Doge IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer L7378,453.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer L7 vs Goldshell Mini Doge II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini Doge II is more profitable at $-0.96/day compared to $-8.22/day for the Antminer L7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer L7 or the Goldshell Mini Doge II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Antminer L7 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer L7 vs Goldshell Mini Doge II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer L7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer L7 vs Goldshell Mini Doge II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer L7 runs at 378,453.0 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini Doge II runs at 952,381.0 J/TH — a difference of 573,927.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficiency (378,453 vs 952,381 J/TH).