Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 32.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 2,200 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 68.8 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 7,500.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T
Based on BTC price of $77,486 and current network difficulty as of Apr 25, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Both the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T are closely matched across our scoring factors, with neither holding a decisive advantage. Your choice should depend on your specific priorities — review the specs and profitability analysis above.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T68.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-4.13/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T runs at 68.8 J/TH — a difference of 27.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
Compare Antminer Loki Edition (S9) with...
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator