Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer Loki Edition (S9)

Antminer Loki Edition (S9)

Hashrate 14.0 TH/s Power 1,350 W Efficiency 96.4 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M53

Whatsminer M53

Hashrate 226.0 TH/s Power 6,554 W Efficiency 29.0 J/TH

Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Whatsminer M53

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer Loki Edition (S9) Specification Whatsminer M53
14.0 TH/s Hashrate 226.0 TH/s
1,350 W Power Consumption 6,554 W
96.4 J/TH Efficiency 29.0 J/TH
55 dB Noise Level 50 dB
6.0 kg Weight 27.5 kg
4,606 BTU/hr BTU Output 22,362 BTU/hr
59/100 Home Mining Score 44/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer Loki Edition (S9)

Daily Revenue 0.00000649 BTC $0.50
Daily Electricity -$3.24
Daily Profit -$2.74
Monthly -$82.15
Yearly -$999.49

Whatsminer M53

Daily Revenue 0.00010478 BTC $8.10
Daily Electricity -$15.73
Daily Profit -$7.63
Monthly -$228.93
Yearly -$2,785.32

Based on BTC price of $77,293 and current network difficulty as of Apr 25, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Whatsminer M53 wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Whatsminer M53 — wins on 3 of 6 factors

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer Loki Edition (S9)

Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M53

29.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Whatsminer M53 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-7.63/day for the Whatsminer M53. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Whatsminer M53?

The Whatsminer M53 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Whatsminer M53?

The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Whatsminer M53). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Whatsminer M53?

The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Whatsminer M53 runs at 29.0 J/TH — a difference of 67.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.