Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 40.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 2,200 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 55.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 5.0 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,091 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 186% more hashrate (14.0 vs 40.0 TH/s). The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) and Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 186% more hashrate (14.0 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 39% better power draw (1,350 vs 2,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 43% better efficiency (96.4 vs 55.0 J/TH)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 100% better weight (5.0 vs 11,500.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 63% more heat output (4,606 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 100% more home mining score (52.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $299 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $155 |
| -$2.73 | Daily net profit | -$3.82 |
| -$1,296 | Net after 1 year | -$1,551 |
| -$2,292 | Net after 2 years | -$2,947 |
| -$3,289 | Net after 3 years | -$4,342 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)55.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.73/day compared to $-3.82/day for the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) or the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) runs at 55.0 J/TH — a difference of 41.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficiency (96.4 vs 55.0 J/TH).
Compare Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) with...
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe Gamma
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe GT
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe Hex