Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs Whatsminer M63
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 360.0 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Power Consumption | 7,200 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,566 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)
Whatsminer M63
Based on BTC price of $77,866 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M63, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 543% more hashrate (56.0 vs 360.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and Whatsminer M63 sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M63 543% more hashrate (56.0 vs 360.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 65% better power draw (2,520 vs 7,200 W)
- Whatsminer M63 56% better efficiency (45.0 vs 20.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M63 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 27.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M63 186% more heat output (8,598 vs 24,566 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63 100% more home mining score (22.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $11,000 |
| -$4.04 | Daily net profit | -$4.38 |
| -$1,888 | Net after 1 year | -$12,599 |
| -$3,363 | Net after 2 years | -$14,198 |
| -$4,838 | Net after 3 years | -$15,796 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M6320.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the Whatsminer M63?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) is more profitable at $-4.04/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Whatsminer M63. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs Whatsminer M63: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M63 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the Whatsminer M63?
The Whatsminer M63 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and Whatsminer M63?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63 runs at 20.0 J/TH — a difference of 25.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficiency (45.0 vs 20.0 J/TH).