Antminer S17+ vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17+ | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 73.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 13.0 TH/s |
| 2,920 W | Power Consumption | 1,300 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 100.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 9,963 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,436 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17+
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer S17+ wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 462% more hashrate (73.0 vs 13.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer S17+ and Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S17+ 462% more hashrate (73.0 vs 13.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 55% better power draw (2,920 vs 1,300 W)
- Antminer S17+ 60% better efficiency (40.0 vs 100.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S17+ 100% better weight (9.5 vs 4,200.0 kg)
- Antminer S17+ 125% more heat output (9,963 vs 4,436 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17+ 171% more home mining score (84.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S17+ | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$4.35 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$1,589 | Net after 1 year | -$1,031 |
| -$3,177 | Net after 2 years | -$1,997 |
| -$4,766 | Net after 3 years | -$2,964 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S17+40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S17+ vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-4.35/day for the Antminer S17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S17+ or the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer S17+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S17+ or the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)?
The Antminer S17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S17+ and Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)?
The Antminer S17+ runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) runs at 100.0 J/TH — a difference of 60.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficiency (40.0 vs 100.0 J/TH).