Antminer S17+ vs Canaan Avalon A1566I
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17+ | Specification | Canaan Avalon A1566I |
|---|---|---|
| 73.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 249.0 TH/s |
| 2,920 W | Power Consumption | 4,500 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 11.3 kg |
| 9,963 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 15,354 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17+
Canaan Avalon A1566I
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Canaan Avalon A1566I wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 241% more hashrate (73.0 vs 249.0 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A1566I's favour. The Antminer S17+ claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S17+ and Canaan Avalon A1566I diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 241% more hashrate (73.0 vs 249.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S17+ 35% better power draw (2,920 vs 4,500 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 55% better efficiency (40.0 vs 18.1 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Antminer S17+ 16% better weight (9.5 vs 11.3 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 54% more heat output (9,963 vs 15,354 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17+ 91% more home mining score (84.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S17+ | Metric | Canaan Avalon A1566I |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,710 |
| -$4.35 | Daily net profit | -$1.74 |
| -$1,589 | Net after 1 year | -$3,346 |
| -$3,177 | Net after 2 years | -$3,982 |
| -$4,766 | Net after 3 years | -$4,617 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566I18.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S17+ or Canaan Avalon A1566I more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566I is more profitable at $-1.74/day compared to $-4.35/day for the Antminer S17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S17+ or the Canaan Avalon A1566I better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer S17+ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S17+ or Canaan Avalon A1566I?
The Antminer S17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Canaan Avalon A1566I). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S17+ vs Canaan Avalon A1566I: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S17+ runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A1566I runs at 18.1 J/TH — a difference of 21.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficiency (40.0 vs 18.1 J/TH).